Determinants for WSD outbreaks in Indonesian smallholder shrimp ponds
25 November 2013 | Richard Callinan, Bambang Sumiarto, Jenny-Ann Toribio, Peter Walker, Ageng S. Herianto, Nicholas Gudkovs, Emma Rooke, Murwantoko, Moch. Natsir Amin, Arief Taslihan, Akmad Mustafa, Mardiana E. Fachry | 1642 Downloads | .pdf | 3.65 MB | Health and welfare, Shrimp, Indonesia
This study focused on events in a representative, 50-pond Indonesian shrimp farming system in Pangkep district, South Sulawesi. Ponds were stocked with Penaeus monodon and the study extended across a single cropping period between May and October 2010. It was designed to improve our understanding of the main causal pathways for white spot disease (WSD), the most serious cause of production loss in these systems. The longitudinal observational study focused on recording the occurrence of different genotypes of the causal infectious agent, white spot syndrome virus (WSSV), in selected components of the system across time, and looking for relationships with pond outcomes, particularly WSD occurrence. We expected that findings would (a) enable relevant Indonesian agencies, and ultimately farmers themselves, to better identify localities suitable for smallholder shrimp farming using better management practice (BMP) programs and (b) inform modification and simplification of these programs, thereby improving both profitability and adoption rates.
- To determine the stability of WSD outbreak-associated WSSV genotypes when passaged through WSSV-free Litopenaeus vannamei, WSSV PCR test-negative P. monodon and selected other WSSV PCR test-negative, non-penaeid hosts;
- To identify, using locality-specific environmental data, pond environmental data and data on WSSV genotype distribution and dynamics, the likely determinants for WSD outbreaks at a suitable, broadly representative locality in South Sulawesi.
Our transmission trials showed that genotype variations did not occur during three sequential passages (four including the preparation of the stock inoculums) in L. vannamei or alternatively in other crustacean hosts. This indicates the genotypes are likely to be sufficiently stable for use in local epidemiological studies during disease outbreaks in shrimp ponds.
WSD outbreaks were recorded in 11 of the study ponds. Outbreaks were attributed to WSSV genotype TRS5 in seven ponds and to genotypes TRS4 and TRS6 in two ponds each. Data analysis showed that:
- WSSV was ubiquitous at the site. Strategies to prevent WSD outbreaks are probably more useful than trying to prevent WSSV infection in endemic areas.
- Stocking with WSSV PCR test-negative postlarvae (PLs) supports maintenance of an outbreak-free pond for at least the first two months of production.
- Once PLs have been excluded as a risk factor for WSSV infection, biosecurity (minimising risk of heavy WSSV exposure post stocking) and environmental factors (management of risk factors for WSD outbreaks) become more important.
- Water released from WSD outbreak ponds was likely to be an important initiator of disease outbreaks in upstream and downstream ponds;
- Crabs, wild shrimp, zooplankton and/or polychaetes were not important sources of WSSV infection for WSD outbreaks in farmed shrimp.
These findings suggest that stocking PCR test-negative PLs, coupled with careful management of water intake during nearby WSD outbreaks are the two most useful practice changes farmers can adopt to reduce the risk of outbreaks in their ponds. Establishment of an active, well-resourced and trained extension service, committed to fostering cohesive, informed farmer groups, is the key to enabling these inexpensive practice changes.
Copyright, all rights reserved.